Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 80/2022

Case between R. Rajesh Prabhu vs Edna Correya et al regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Court
ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-02-29
Duration
approximately-5 years 9 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

R. Rajesh Prabhu is seeking eviction of Edna Correya and others due to non-payment of rent for a commercial building. The respondents, being the legal heirs of the original tenant, denied the landlord-tenant relationship.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was allowed, directing the respondents to vacate the premises within 30 days. The order also allowed the petitioner to recover costs from the respondents.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondents from the petition schedule building
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Existence of landlord-tenant relationship established despite respondents' claims.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows. 1. The respondents are directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under section 11(2)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

R. Rajesh Prabhu (50 years years) 2B, Indradhunash Apartments, T D Road, Ernakulam, Kochi 682023

Defendants

Edna Correya (60 years years) 47/306, Ambat House, Vaduthala, Kochi-682023 Dany Correya (38 years years) 47/306, Ambat House, Vaduthala, Kochi-682023 Binu Correya (36 years years) 47/306, Ambat House, Vaduthala, Kochi-682023 Dayana Coreya (34 years years) 47/306, Ambat House, Vaduthala, Kochi-682023

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner sought eviction of the respondents from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed as follows. The respondents are directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under section 11(2)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Statutory Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice was issued to the respondents demanding payment of arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment cards were produced to prove that the statutory notice was served on the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2 Series
Document Type: Order Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the order in RCP 132/2017 was filed to support the petitioner's case.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Objection Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the objection filed by the respondent in RCP 132/2017 was presented as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Deposition Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the deposition of Dany Correya in RCP 132/2017 was filed for reference.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Order Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the order in RCP 132/2017 was used to show previous court proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: RCA Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of RCA 4/2020 was introduced to illustrate the appeal against prior orders.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Order Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the order in RCA 4/2020 was presented to support the petitioner's claims regarding landlord-tenant relationship.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 10/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases