Case Summary
The complainant, R. Rajamani, alleged that the accused, P.Baju, committed an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused due to the complainant's continuous absence and lack of vigilance in pursuing the case.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the matter and did not provide a plausible explanation for his absence.
The complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the matter and did not provide a plausible explanation for his absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the matter and did not provide a plausible explanation for his absence.
The complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the matter and did not provide a plausible explanation for his absence.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the complainant is not vigilant in pursuing the matter.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the accused is acquitted u/s. 256(1) Cr.P.C. His bail bond stands cancelled and he is set at liberty.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- R. Rajamani
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.Baju
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V. Padmakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Complaint was dismissed due to the absence of the complainant.
Evidence:
Hence, complaint is dismissed u/s 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Chief Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These exhibits were marked during the court proceedings.
Reference:
Exbt. P1 to P5
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between R. Rajamani vs P.Baju regarding offence u/s. 138 of N.I. Act.
Case Code Year
Case between R. Rajamani vs P.Baju regarding offence u/s. 138 of N.I. Act.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Arrest Involved
Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act