Case Summary
The complainant, R. Rajamani, alleged that the accused, P.Baju, committed an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the matter and did not provide a plausible explanation for his absence.
The complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the matter and did not provide a plausible explanation for his absence.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the accused is acquitted u/s. 256(1) Cr.P.C. His bail bond stands cancelled and he is set at liberty.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
R. Rajamani (40 years)
Kodavath Veedu, Naduvilangadi, P.O., Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur – 676 107, Tirur Taluk, Malappuram District.
Defendants
P.Baju (39 years)
Palliri House, P.O. Pachattiri, Tirur, Malappuram.
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Complaint was dismissed due to the absence of the complainant.
Evidence:
Hence, complaint is dismissed u/s 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Chief Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These exhibits were marked during the court proceedings.
Reference:
Exbt. P1 to P5