ORIGINAL SUIT No. 77 OF 2000

Case between Puthanveettil Hashim et al vs Karattu thodi Moideen kutty et al regarding declaration and permanent injunction

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-09-16

Duration

17 years

Case Closed

Sat, 09/16/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs Hashim and Kunhimuhammed filed a suit seeking declaration and permanent injunction against defendants Moideen kutty et al. The plaintiffs were absent during the final hearing, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The suit for declaration and permanent injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the final hearing.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Unknown

Case Type

Civil Suit - Declaration and Permanent Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit for declaration and permanent injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the final hearing.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for declaration and permanent injunction. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. The name of the plaintiffs are called. Absent. Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Puthanveettil Hashim
Party Age: 34
Relation: S/o Issahak Muhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Karanathupalliyalil Kunhimuhammed
Party Age: 36
Relation: S/o Beeran

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Karattu thodi Moideen kutty @ Bappu
Party Age: 45

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mulamukkil Kunhimuhammed @ Bava
Party Age: 45

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Parammal Mammu
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o Saithali

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Parammal Kunhu
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o Saithali

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Palara Unneen
Party Age: 47
Relation: S/o Muhammed

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pullanikkattil Musthafa
Party Age: 37
Relation: S/o Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Parappil Veeran
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o Moidu

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit for declaration and permanent injunction

Evidence:

The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. The name of the plaintiffs are called. Absent. Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification