Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 105 OF 2014

Case between Ayisha et al vs Aayappally Muhammed et al regarding mandatory injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2014-07-31
Duration
Not mentioned
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2014 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs filed a suit against the defendants seeking a mandatory injunction. The case was settled through compromise and the court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs based on a lawful compromise agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs based on a lawful compromise agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The compromise petition is lawful, and the suit is decreed without cost in terms of the compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed without cost in terms of the compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayisha
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o. Alathiruthy Aboobacker
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vaniyapeediyakkal Koya
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o. Moideenkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aayappally Muhammed @ Bappu
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o. Saidali
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aayappally Abdul Gafoor
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o. Saidali
Plaintiffs Documents
I.A. 2023/2014, Power of attorney, Compromise petition (I.A. 2024/2014)
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P. Khaleel Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. U. Sainudheen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction against the defendants.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed without cost in terms of the compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ayisha et al vs Aayappally Muhammed et al regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ayisha et al vs Aayappally Muhammed et al regarding mandatory injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 07/31/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2014 - 12:00
From
Wed, 07/02/2014 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thekkepeediyekkal Muhammed vs Pulikkal Saidalavi regarding mandatory injunction
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kadalayi Hussain et al vs Manedath Khadeeja regarding mandatory injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kaladi Abdul Azeez vs Kadalambathoor Nanikkutty regarding mandatory injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Areekkunnath Sreenivasan and Dr.K.Abdul Nazar et al regarding possession dispute
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Nambunni vs Vasudevan regarding mandatory injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction Defendant Won