Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 420/2025

Case between P.U Mathen vs Shaji Kurian et al regarding ad interim injunction

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-11-03
Duration
Case Code No.
420
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.U Mathen, the plaintiff, filed an application for an ad interim injunction against the defendants, Shaji Kurian and Shintu Susan Shaji, to prevent them from excavating soil from specific properties. The court found a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad interim injunction to the plaintiff against the defendants to prevent soil excavation that would damage the plaintiff’s property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad interim injunction to the plaintiff against the defendants to prevent soil excavation that would damage the plaintiff’s property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was established by the plaintiff showing potential harm from the defendants' actions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case was established by the plaintiff showing potential harm from the defendants' actions.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and if notice issued delay will occurred and the same would defeat the very purpose of the above application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence ad interim injunction is granted, the defendants and men under them from temporarily restrained from further excavating soil from plaint schedule item No.3 property there by causing damage to the lateral support of plaint schedule item.1 property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.U Mathen
Party Age
87
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaji Kurian
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shintu Susan Shaji
Party Age
27
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Emmanual Podipara
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. R. Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad interim injunction is granted, the defendants and men under them from temporarily restrained from further excavating soil from plaint schedule item No.3 property thereby causing damage to the lateral support of plaint schedule item No.1 property.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and if notice issued delay will occurred and the same would defeat the very purpose of the above application. Hence ad interim injunction is granted, the defendants and men under them from temporarily restrained from further excavating soil from plaint schedule item No.3 property there by causing damage to the lateral support of plaint schedule item.1 property.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between R Ramachandran Nair et al vs Sivasankarapanicker et al regarding ad interim injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Divya R Nair vs Deepthy R Nair et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Saina Joy et al vs Jeo George regarding obstruction to the use of bathroom/toilet.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Saina Joy, Joy Markose vs Jeo George regarding obstruction to the user of bathroom/toilet.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Pathorse vs Ambily M B et al regarding injunction against trespassing and demolition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Defendant Won