Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 56/2024

Case between Preetha Prabhakar vs Shabna.M regarding eviction from rental property

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-01-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Preetha Prabhakar, living abroad, seeks eviction of her tenant, Shabna.M, due to unpaid rent. The petitioner claims her family's need for the property for residential purposes while the tenant has been irregular in payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the eviction petition, directing the tenant to vacate the property within 30 days. The court also awarded costs to the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Tenant is directed to put the landlord in possession of the property.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established arrears of rent and a bonafide need for the property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Act with costs as follows:- The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Preetha Prabhakar (46 years) Thottungal (H), Methala, Anappuzha.P.O., Kodungalloor, Thrissur - 680 664

Defendants

Shabna.M (Age not specified years) C.C.No.39/798A, YMJ Road, West Kaloor, Ernakulam - 682 018

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to recover costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: General Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Admitted to establish the petitioner's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Admitted as evidence of communication regarding rent arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Reply of Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Admitted to show the response from the respondent regarding the arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Admitted to support the case regarding the condition of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 10/01/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases