Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 670 of 2022

Case between Philomina V.V. vs K.K Navas regarding realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-01-31
Duration
approximately-3 years 8 months 11 days
Case Closed
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Philomina V.V., is seeking to recover Rs. 8,00,000 from the defendant, K.K Navas, who failed to repay a loan. The defendant did not respond to the suit or appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing her to recover Rs. 8,00,000 along with interest from the defendant. The defendant was absent throughout the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to recover Rs 8,00,000 together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till entire realization
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing her to recover Rs. 8,00,000 along with interest from the defendant. The defendant was absent throughout the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint averments stand proved based on unrebutted evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaint averments stand proved based on unrebutted evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted evidence of PW1 and from documents the plaint averments stands proved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff is allowed to recover Rs 8,00,000 together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till entire realization in full from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Philomina V.V.
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.K Navas
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque bearing No. 094054, Copy of cheque return memo, Office copy of the lawyer notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renjith.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anju Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover Rs 8,00,000 along with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover Rs 8,00,000 (Rupees Eight lakhs only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till entire realization in full from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a cheque bearing No. 094054 which was issued for the amount claimed.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a copy of the cheque return memo showing that the cheque was returned with the endorsement 'account blocked'.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the office copy of the lawyer's notice sent to the defendant requesting payment.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Philomina V.V. vs K.K Navas regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Philomina V.V. vs K.K Navas regarding realisation of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 05/20/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won