Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Philomina V.J. and Rose Angel, are seeking a partition of a property inherited from their deceased father, V.P. Joseph. The defendants, including Kochu Tresia, contest the plaintiffs' claims of ownership and have filed a written statement in defense.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs' evidence was unrebutted and established their case for partition.
The plaintiffs' evidence was unrebutted and established their case for partition.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: 1. The plaint schedule property shall be divided by metes and bounds into 15 equal shares and allot 4/15th shares to the plaintiffs by actual division and separation.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Philomina V.J. (56 years years)
Thuppathil House, Nazareth, Aluva, Pin - 683101
Rose Angel (60 years years)
Thaiparambil House, Kandanadu Desom, Kothadu P.O., Pin - 682027
Defendants
Kochu Tresia (86 years years)
Velikakathu House, Kadamakudy Village, Kothadu P.O., Pin - 682027
Tresa Shiny (47 years years)
Pokkathu House, Kothadu P.O., Pin-682027
Mary Wilson (53 years years)
Porather Kumkumathu House, Manaloor Kaniyani P.O., Thrissur District
Antony (50 years years)
Velikakathu House, Kothadu P.O., Pin-682027
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: 1. The plaint schedule property shall be divided by metes and bounds into 15 equal shares and allot 4/15th shares to the plaintiffs by actual division and separation.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from alienating, encumbering or committing waste over the shares allotted to the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 from alienating, encumbering or committing waste over the shares allotted to the plaintiffs.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of certificate of purchase of Kudikidappu
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Accepted and marked in evidence to establish the plaint claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1