Case Summary
Plaintiffs, two siblings, filed a suit against three defendants, also siblings, seeking partition of inherited property. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for partition. Today it is posted for plaintiff's evidence. Plaintiff is absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Khadeeja
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o. Aboobacker
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhammad
- Party Age
- 50
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aboobacker
- Party Age
- 48
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulaiman
- Party Age
- 44
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hamza
- Party Age
- 42
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.Shanmughan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Partition of inherited property
Evidence:
Today it is posted for plaintiff's evidence. Plaintiff is absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition of inheritance
Case Code
Case between Panakkal Muhammed's Children et al vs Panakkal Muhammed's Children et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Panakkal Muhammed's Children et al vs Panakkal Muhammed's Children et al regarding partition