Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restoration Petition 991/2017

Case between Paarammal Hussain vs Chaatheri Abdu Rahiman regarding restoration petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-07-25
Duration
0 years, 3 months, 29 days
Case Closed
Tue, 07/25/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Paarammal Hussain filed a restoration petition against Chaatheri Abdu Rahiman, which was allowed on payment of costs as per separate orders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The restoration petition filed by Paarammal Hussain was allowed on payment of a cost of Rs.6000.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of Petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The restoration petition filed by Paarammal Hussain was allowed on payment of a cost of Rs.6000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

IA stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.6000/- Vide separate order. On payment of costs in IA 990/17 this IA stands allowed. IA 990/17- Petition stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.6000/-. For payment of costs. Cost paid IA allowed

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Paarammal Hussain
Party Age
1
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chaatheri Abdu Rahiman
Party Age
48
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
GOPIKADAVATH
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Appearing for Chaatheri Abdu Rahiman
Appearance Type
Unknown

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration of petition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration of the petition was granted on payment of costs.
Evidence:
IA stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.6000/- Vide separate order. On payment of costs in IA 990/17 this IA stands allowed. IA 990/17- Petition stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.6000/-. For payment of costs. Cost paid IA allowed

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Paarammal Hussain vs Chaatheri Abdu Rahiman regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Paarammal Hussain vs Chaatheri Abdu Rahiman regarding restoration petition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 04/05/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 07/25/2017 - 12:00
From
Sat, 07/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/14/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Parangodan vs Krishnan et al regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Defendant Won