Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Restoration Petition 991/2017

Case between Paarammal Hussain vs Chaatheri Abdu Rahiman regarding restoration petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-07-25
Duration
0 years, 3 months, 29 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Paarammal Hussain filed a restoration petition against Chaatheri Abdu Rahiman, which was allowed on payment of costs as per separate orders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The restoration petition filed by Paarammal Hussain was allowed on payment of a cost of Rs.6000.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of Petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

IA stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.6000/- Vide separate order. On payment of costs in IA 990/17 this IA stands allowed. IA 990/17- Petition stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.6000/-. For payment of costs. Cost paid IA allowed

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Paarammal Hussain (1 years) Thanaloor amsom, Areekkod desom, Post-Thalakkdathoor

Defendants

Chaatheri Abdu Rahiman (48 years) Thanaloor amsom, Areekod desom and post Thalakkadathoor

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration of petition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration of the petition was granted on payment of costs.
Evidence:
IA stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.6000/- Vide separate order. On payment of costs in IA 990/17 this IA stands allowed. IA 990/17- Petition stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.6000/-. For payment of costs. Cost paid IA allowed

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Wed, 04/05/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases