Case Summary
O.C. Alexander, the landlord, filed a petition against Shyam Krishna K.R., the tenant, for non-compliance with rent payment. The court ordered the tenant to vacate the premises due to failure to pay arrears.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the property to the petitioner.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the landlord, ordering the tenant to vacate the property due to non-payment of rent arrears.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not comply with the order to pay rent and failed to show cause for non-compliance.
The respondent did not comply with the order to pay rent and failed to show cause for non-compliance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not comply with the order to pay rent and failed to show cause for non-compliance.
The respondent did not comply with the order to pay rent and failed to show cause for non-compliance.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent did not comply with order in IA 01/2022 passed under Section 12(1) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, entire proceedings in the rent control petition stands closed and the respondent/tenant is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the petitioner/landlord under Section 12(3) of the Act.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- O.C. Alexander
- Party Age
- 74
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shyam Krishna K.R.
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Petition under Section 11(2)(b) & 11(4) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.G. Jayashankar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.K. Reshma
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sajana V.H.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vinitha S.T.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ruby K. Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.A. Mohammed Salih
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the petitioner/landlord.
Evidence:
Hence, entire proceedings in the rent control petition stands closed and the respondent/tenant is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the petitioner/landlord under Section 12(3) of the Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between O.C. Alexander vs Shyam Krishna K.R. regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between O.C. Alexander vs Shyam Krishna K.R. regarding Rent Control