Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 81/2020

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Mymoonath et al regarding eviction and rental arrears

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, N.X. Joseph Jason, filed a rent control petition against Mymoonath and V.U. Musthafa for eviction due to non-payment of rent and illegal subletting. The respondents contested the claims, asserting that they had not defaulted on rent and had been granted permission for occupancy.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing eviction of the first respondent and addressing the issue of rent arrears, confirming that the first respondent had not paid rent since April 2006.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the first respondent and costs awarded to the petitioner.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the claims of non-payment and illegal subletting substantiated.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows; (i) The eviction sought under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act is allowed, and the 1st respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

N.X. Joseph Jason (56 years) Nilavareth House, Bank Road, Kaloor, Kochi-682017, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Mymoonath (62 years) Door No.65/2186, Azad Road, Kaloor, Kochi-682017 V.U. Musthafa (65 years) Door No.65/2186, Azad Road, Kaloor, Kochi-682017

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the first respondent under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act.
Evidence:
The eviction sought under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act is allowed, and the 1st respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondents under Section 11(4)(i) of the Act.
Evidence:
The eviction sought under Section 11(4)(i) of the Act is allowed, and the respondents are directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner entitled to costs of the proceedings from the respondents.
Evidence:
Hence, the petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the proceedings from the respondents.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Application submitted before Cochin Municipal Corporation along with reply received under RTI Act.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice issued to the first respondent seeking to terminate the sublease with the second respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original acknowledgment card for lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Will
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Will No.99/1982 showing the ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate of N.G. Xavier.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate of Tressa Xavier.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt dated 29.09.2025.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Professional tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Professional tax receipt confronted and marked through PW1.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: License fee
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original license fee.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: License fee
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original license fee.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Professional tax
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original professional tax.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Professional tax
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original professional tax.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: License fee
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original license fee.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Professional tax
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original professional tax.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: License fee
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original license fee.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Professional tax
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Original professional tax.
Reference:
Ext.B9

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases