Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 221/2022

Case between Noushad.T.H vs Irine Xavier et al regarding injunction

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-07-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Noushad.T.H, filed a suit for injunction against the defendant, Irine Xavier, and an additional defendant, Sajish.K.J. The plaintiff has indicated that he does not wish to pursue the matter further.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit is dismissed as not pressed, and each party will bear their own costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit is dismissed as not pressed, and each party will bear their own costs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff does not intend to proceed with the matter further.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff does not intend to proceed with the matter further.
Supporting Evidence
The counsel for plaintiff filed not press memo.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Noushad.T.H
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Irine Xavier
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajish.K.J
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
H. Nujumudeen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Antony shyju
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Simi.M.Jacob
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.L.Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joby Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is for injunction and the plaintiff does not intend to proceed further.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff does not intend to proceed the matter further.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Noushad.T.H vs Irine Xavier et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Noushad.T.H vs Irine Xavier et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Santharam et al vs R. Ramesh et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between V. N Ranganathan vs Sajeevan et al regarding injunction and consequential relief
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Jose John vs Golden Metro Apartment Owners Association et al regarding violations of association bylaws and waste collection
MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between K.S. Vinod vs Dr. S. Satish Bhat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Shyju Antony vs The Apostolic Administrator et al regarding appointments of Chancellor & Finance Officer
The Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Injunction Defendant Won