Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.652/2021

Case between K.S. Vinod vs Dr. S. Satish Bhat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-02-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case filed by former Boxing Champion to seek injunction against forceful eviction from leased property due to COVID-19 financial difficulties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff granted permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Defendant undertook not to forcefully evict plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K.S. Vinod (47 years) IA, Tanzeel Apartment, Kumaranasan Nagar, Kadvanthara P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682 020

Defendants

Dr. S. Satish Bhat (49 years) 9B, Yasoram Tejus Apartments, High School Road, Vennala P.O., Ernakulam District, Pin-682028 Antony A.P. (Age not specified years) Alummootil house, Easterlilly, Kakkanad P.O., Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent forceful eviction
Evidence:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction was passed by the court

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff entered into a 15-year lease agreement with 1st defendant for the land
Reference:
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
1st defendant issued a legal notice demanding arrears
Reference:
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff responded with a reply notice disputing the arrears
Reference:
Document Type: Court Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Court allowed the IA filed by plaintiff regarding removal of 2nd defendant
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases