Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 453/2023

Case between Santharam et al vs R. Ramesh et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-02-25
Duration
5 years 21 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Santharam and Raghavendra Bhat, sought an injunction against the defendants, R. Ramesh and M. Venugopalan, for failing to construct agreed villas on the plaintiffs' property. After the defendants were set ex parte for not filing a written statement, the court concluded in favor of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendants. The plaintiffs were also awarded costs of the suit from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the Plaint A Schedule property
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs proved their case based on uncontested evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed by restraining the defendants, their men and gangsters from trespassing into the Plaint A Schedule property or doing any mischief thereon and also from doing anything which will infringe the plaintiffs right, title, ownership and possession of plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Santharam (65 years) Maruthi Nivas, Manath Road, Ambadimoola, Thrikkakara P.O, Pin - 682 021 Raghavendra Bhat (61 years) Maruthi Nivas, Manath Road, Ambadimoola, Thrikkakara P.O, Pin - 682 021 Sasikala Santharam (60 years) Flat No. C2, 2ⁿᵈ Floor, Cloud Space, Edachira, Ernakulam

Defendants

Mr. R. Ramesh (60 years) 'Midhunam', Padamugal, Kakkanad P.O, Pin - 682 030 Mr. M. Venugopalan (61 years) 'Harivarsham', Thuravoor Post, Alleppey - 688 532

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is issued against the defendants.
Evidence:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed by restraining the defendants, their men and gangsters from trespassing into the Plaint A Schedule property.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
I am also of the opinion that the plaintiffs are entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Partition Deed establishing ownership of the Plaint A Schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the agreement executed between plaintiffs and defendants regarding the construction of villas.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Computer print out of statement of account showing transactions related to the agreement cancellation.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Computer print out of statement of account showing subsequent transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 02/01/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases