Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 32/2024

Case between Narayanan K.C. vs Abdul Jabbar K.M. regarding eviction and rent arrears

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-06-15
Duration
approximately-3 years 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Narayanan K.C., owns a property in Ernakulam and has filed for eviction against his tenant, Abdul Jabbar K.M., for non-payment of rent. The respondent defaulted on rent payments since September 2022 and has not vacated the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition and directed the tenant to vacate the property within 30 days. The petitioner is also entitled to recover the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the tenant from the property
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved his case and the need projected is not malafide.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed u/S 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) with costs as follows. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(ii)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Act within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Narayanan K.C. (66 years) Kuzhiparambu House, Palarivattom(PO), Edappally South Village, Ernakulam-682 025

Defendants

Abdul Jabbar K.M. (53 years) Kizhakkeanikkath House, Vadacode P.O., Kangarapady, Thrikkakara North-682 021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the A schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(ii)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original rent agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the terms of the rental agreement between the petitioner and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a notice sent to the respondent demanding payment of rent arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of mailing the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms receipt of the lawyer's notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 12/01/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases