Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 247/2023

Case between Naagaas vs Parthas Textiles et al regarding suit rejection

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the plaintiff, Naagaas, a wholesale textile dealer, against Parthas Textiles and its partners regarding the rejection of the suit. The court rejected the suit due to non-payment of court fees despite multiple chances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the balance court fee despite being given numerous chances.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the balance court fee despite being given numerous chances.
Key Reasoning:
Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances.
Why Defendant Won:
Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 14th day of March, 2025).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Naagaas
Party Age
71
Relation
Rep.by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Parthas Textiles
Relation
Rep.by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Praveen Raj
Relation
Partner
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lakshman Kumar
Relation
Partner
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. T Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashitha S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Naagaas vs Parthas Textiles et al regarding suit rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Naagaas vs Parthas Textiles et al regarding suit rejection

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Maya Printers vs Sandhya Anil regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s PromoteN vs Basheer regarding money recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Smt. Andal vs H Venkatesha Naik Jewellary et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won