Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST 55/2022

Case between M.V. George vs V.I. Shajahan regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Court
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-IV
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-07-29
Duration
approximately-3 years 3 months 7 days
Case Code No.
55
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M.V. George, the proprietor of Veeyam Marketing Enterprises, has filed a complaint against V.I. Shajahan alleging an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed a petition to withdraw the complaint, which was granted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court granted permission for the complainant to withdraw the complaint. Consequently, the accused was acquitted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court granted permission for the complainant to withdraw the complaint. Consequently, the accused was acquitted.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

The above complaint is filed alleging offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Complainant present. Accused represented. Complainant filed petition to withdraw the complaint. Permission is granted. Accused is acquitted under Section 257 Cr.PC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.V. George
Relation
Proprietor
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.I. Shajahan
Relation
Proprietor
Plaintiffs Documents
Petition to withdraw the complaint
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Emmanuel Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. K.A Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition to withdraw the complaint
Evidence:
Complainant filed petition to withdraw the complaint. Permission is granted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST
Case Code Year
2022

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
KOTTAYAM
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Fri, 04/22/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jayamol T N vs Jayamon T N regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Rashtra Deepika Ltd vs Anish Mathew regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd. vs Shafana Nishad regarding withdrawal of complaint
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. vs Sabitha regarding Section 138 of NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits vs Shyla Saji regarding Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Criminal Case Defendant Won