Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST 190/2020

Case between Rashtra Deepika Ltd vs Anish Mathew regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-IV
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
approximately-5 years 5 months 14 days
Case Code No.
190
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rashtra Deepika Ltd, a public limited company, filed a complaint against Anish Mathew alleging an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant later requested to withdraw the complaint, which was permitted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court granted permission for the complainant to withdraw the complaint. Consequently, the accused was acquitted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court granted permission for the complainant to withdraw the complaint. Consequently, the accused was acquitted.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant withdrew the complaint, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant withdrew the complaint, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant filed petition to withdraw the complaint.

Judgment Evidence:

Permission is granted. Accused is acquitted under Section 257 Cr.PC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rashtra Deepika Ltd
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anish Mathew
Plaintiffs Documents
Complaint filed on 17.02.2020.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Complainant
Advocate Name
Adv. Sajeevu Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Preetha P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission granted to withdraw the complaint.
Evidence:
Complainant filed petition to withdraw the complaint. Permission is granted.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted under Section 257 Cr.PC.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
KOTTAYAM
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Mon, 02/17/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd. vs Soudamini T regarding Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -IV, KOTTAYAM
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd. vs Shafana Nishad regarding withdrawal of complaint
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd. vs Sabitha regarding Section 138 of NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits vs Shyla Saji regarding Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Finvent Finance and Investments Ltd. vs Rajimol P V regarding complaint withdrawal
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Criminal Case Defendant Won