Case Summary
The case involves a complaint filed by Jayamol T N against Jayamon T N, alleging an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Both parties were absent during the proceedings, leading to the complaint being dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed due to the absence of both the complainant and the accused during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Complaint is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayamol T N
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayamon T N
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D. Zibo
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Leena Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Complaint is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Evidence:
Hence Complaint is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act