Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 289 OF 2018

Case between Muhammed vs Shamleekh regarding money recovery

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-09-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Shamleekh for recovering Rs. 10,00,000/- which Shamleekh borrowed to extend his textile business and failed to repay. The court found the plaintiff's claims credible due to the absence of a written statement from the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover Rs. 10,00,000/- from the defendant. The plaintiff was also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Amount of Rs.10,00,000/- and the costs of the suit from the defendant
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff remained unchallenged as the defendant did not file a written statement or present any evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten lakh only) from the defendant and his assets. II. Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed (55 years) Mollancheri House, Valavannur amsom desom & Post, Kadungathukundu, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Shamleekh (35 years) Parambil Peedikayil House, Thrikkanapuram amsom, Kadakasseri desom, P.O.Ayankalam, Ponnani Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
I find no reason to disbelieve PW1. Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement executed regarding the loan given to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the defendant for the loan amount as a security.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo indicating the cheque was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Tue, 10/30/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases