Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 346 OF 2018

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Mahesh kumar.P.P. regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-03-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Mahesh kumar.P.P. for realization of money due to non-repayment of an agricultural loan of Rs. 1,00,000. The defendant defaulted on the loan repayment despite multiple demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 1,50,255 to the bank with future interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is hereby directed to pay the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs. 1,50,255/- with future interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff bank proved the case with cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is hereby directed to pay the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs. 1,50,255 /- with future interest at 10.6% per annum on Rs.1,47,868/- from the date of suit till the date of realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank, By its Manager (Age not specified years) Kuttippuram Branch

Defendants

Mahesh kumar.P.P. (48 years years) Pachattiri Parambil House, Thozhuvanoor amsom, Karthala Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is granted the recovery of Rs. 1,50,255/- along with future interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is hereby directed to pay the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs. 1,50,255 /- with future interest at 10.6% per annum on Rs.1,47,868/- from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agricultural Loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was the application for the agricultural loan submitted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms of the hypothecation for the loan of Rs. 1,00,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof that the defendant acknowledged the debt on 03.09.2016.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the notice sent to the defendant regarding the payment due.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Unclaimed Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The returned cover signifies that the defendant did not accept the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Copy of Ledger Extract
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a certified copy of the accounts related to the defendant's transactions with the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases