Case Summary
The complainant Muhammed Kutty filed a case against the accused Pottachola saidu under section 138 of N.I. Act. The complainant later sought to withdraw the complaint, which was granted, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal
Case Type
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act
Final Judgment
No
The accused is acquitted under section 257 Cr.P.C. as the complainant sought to withdraw the complaint.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint. In the result, the accused is acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Kutty
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pottachola saidu
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Acquittal of the accused under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint. In the result, the accused is acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Section 138 of N.I. Act
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Kutty vs Pottachola saidu
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Kutty vs Pottachola saidu
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case