Case Summary
Plaintiff aged 43 filed a suit for injunction against defendants Beeran Koya and Suhara which was dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ajmal Hidayathulla
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beeran Koya
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suhara
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vettom Grama Panchayath
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Relief sought for injunction
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Ajmal Hidayathulla vs Beeran Koya et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Ajmal Hidayathulla vs Beeran Koya et al regarding injunction