Case Summary
M/s.Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited filed a petition to restore an earlier case. The respondents remained ex parte during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition to restore the earlier case as the respondents were absent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed based on the affidavit and in the interest of justice.
The petition was allowed based on the affidavit and in the interest of justice.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and in the interest of justice IA allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
IA allowed. Since the respondents remained exparte. No costs ordered.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s.Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anandhu. S. Raj
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sivarajan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.V. Jayanthi
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.R.Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restore RP 74/24
Evidence:
IA allowed. Since the respondents remained exparte.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022