Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.629/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs St.Jude Missionary Institution et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-21
Duration
approximately-1 year 8 months
Case Code No.
629
Case Closed
Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff and St.Jude Missionary Institution and Yesudasan as defendants. The defendants filed a petition to set aside an exparte decree dated 17/10/2023, citing illness as the reason for their absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petitions IA 01/2025 and RP 38/2025 filed by the defendants to set aside the exparte decree were dismissed by the court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petitions IA 01/2025 and RP 38/2025 filed by the defendants to set aside the exparte decree were dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioners did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claim for condoning the delay.
Supporting Evidence
The delay has not been explained at all. Hence, the petition for condonation of delay is only to be dismissed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2025 and RP 38/2025 are dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
St.Jude Missionary Institution
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yesudasan
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saju George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
I.Sowfiuar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Prayer for condonation of delay in filing the petition to set aside the exparte decree.
Evidence:
Hence, the petition for condonation of delay is only to be dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Prayer to set aside the exparte decree dated 17/10/2023.
Evidence:
In view of my findings on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/17/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between The Branch Manger, Canara Bank vs M/s.Bismilla Stores et al regarding restoration of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Kundara vs Sujitha et al regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Janasree Sangham et al regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Anaswara et al regarding restoration of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Stanly John et al regarding restoration of EP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won