Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.710/2018

Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Kundara vs Sujitha et al regarding restoration of suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
Case Code No.
710
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Branch Manager of Canara Bank filed petitions to restore a suit that was previously rejected due to non-payment of court fees and to condone a delay in filing the review petition. The respondents did not appear before the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed both the petitions filed by the plaintiff for the restoration of the suit and condonation of delay. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed both the petitions filed by the plaintiff for the restoration of the suit and condonation of delay. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to provide sufficient reason for the delay in filing the review petition and did not follow the proper procedure.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
It is settled that if the review application for restoration of suit can be allowed if the plaintiff demonstrates that he fails to pay the Court fee was not deliberate. Here the calculation of delay is the not correct and no sufficient reason stated in the affidavit for the long delay of 90 days in filing RP 253/24.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/24 and RP 253/2024 are dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Kundara
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujitha, D/o Prasanna Kumar, Ambiyil Kizhakkathil Puthen Veedu, Ambipoika, Kundara, Kollam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasannakumar, Ambiyil Kizhakkathil Puthen Veedu, Ambipoika, Kundara, Kollam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Padmakumari, Ambiyil Kizhakkathil Puthen Veedu, Ambipoika, Kundara, Kollam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sandhya, W/o Krishna Kumar, Nandanam, Murunthal, Perinad, Kollam
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
I.Sowfiuar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
IA 01/24 is only liable to be dismissed.
Evidence:
IA 01/24 is only liable to be dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
RP 253/2024 are dismissed.
Evidence:
In the result, IA 01/24 and RP 253/2024 are dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of court fee
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs HACS Manufactures regarding realisation of amount
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs St.Jude Missionary Institution et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Janasree Sangham et al regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Anaswara et al regarding restoration of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Stanly John et al regarding restoration of EP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won