Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.508/2016

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs HACS Manufactures regarding realisation of amount

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
approximately-7 years 2 months
Case Code No.
508
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Canara Bank has filed this case against HACS Manufactures for the recovery of a loan amounting to Rs. 6,15,005 with interest. The suit was previously rejected due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petitions filed by the plaintiff were dismissed due to insufficient evidence to justify the delay in filing the review and restoration requests.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petitions filed by the plaintiff were dismissed due to insufficient evidence to justify the delay in filing the review and restoration requests.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to convincingly explain the delay and did not provide sufficient evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to convincingly explain the delay and did not provide sufficient evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The reason stated to condone the delay of 1760 days is not proved by the petitioner. Delay is not at all explained.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2024 and RP 43/2024 are dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
HACS Manufactures
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Balance court fee remittance record
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
I.Sowfiuar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kannanalloor S.Abdul Karim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
IA 01/2024 for condoning the delay in filing RP 43/2024.
Evidence:
Hence, IA 01/2024 for condoning the delay is to be dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Restoration of suit OS 508/2016.
Evidence:
In view of the finding on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of court fee
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sat, 07/02/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs St.Jude Missionary Institution et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Kundara vs Sujitha et al regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Janasree Sangham et al regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Anaswara et al regarding restoration of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Stanly John et al regarding restoration of EP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won