Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 212/2023

Case between M/s Wallmaax Paints Pvt Ltd. vs Madhu M.D regarding recovery of money.

Court
I Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-04-12
Duration
approximately-1 year 1 month

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Wallmaax Paints Pvt Ltd. filed a suit against Madhu M.D for the recovery of Rs. 5,73,447/- and future interest. The defendant failed to appear in court and was set exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit directing the defendant to pay Rs. 5,73,447/- along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay Rs. 5,73,447/- with 9% future interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.5,73,447/- with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit (ie, from 27.02.2023) till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Wallmaax Paints Pvt Ltd. (Age not specified years) 349/D, Aldrit Complex, Vaduthala P.O, Kochi – 682 023

Defendants

Madhu M.D (58 years) Moolakkapparambil, Vavakkad, Moothakunnam, North Parur – 683 516

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.5,73,447/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.5,73,447/- (Rupees five lakhs seventy three thousand four hundred and forty seven only) with 9% future interest per annum from the date of suit (ie, from 27.02.2023) till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Memorandum and Articles of Association
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the legitimacy and operational structure of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was issued by the defendant to discharge liability but was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo provides evidence of the dishonouring of the cheque issued by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendant regarding the dishonoured cheque.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms that the defendant received the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Returned postal cover with A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof that the notice was returned to the sender.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement details the transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Audited Balance Sheet
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides financial details including the list of debtors.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certified document is related to the ownership rights involved in the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 02/27/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases