Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 666 /20 24

Case between M/s Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Deepesh Kumar et al regarding restoration of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M
Order Date
2026-01-17
Duration
approximately-0 years 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, M/s Thoppil Fincorp and its proprietor T.V. Thomas, sought to restore a suit against the respondents Deepesh Kumar and Neethu Shajan. The court found sufficient reasons to grant the restoration.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for restoration of the suit was allowed as the court found the objections from respondents 1 and 2 to be non-existent, thus restoring the suit back to file.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for restoration of the suit was allowed as the court found the objections from respondents 1 and 2 to be non-existent, thus restoring the suit back to file.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The reasons stated in the affidavit were found sufficient to grant the restoration.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Perused the affidavit filed along with the petition satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore, the petition is allowed. Suit is restored back to file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Thoppil Fincorp
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.V.Thomas
Party Age
62
Relation
Proprietor of M/s Thoppil Fincorp
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepesh Kumar
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Neethu Shajan
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thomas C.A
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E.S.M.Kabeer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sheeba C
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sherin Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed. Suit is restored back to file.
Evidence:
Therefore, the petition is allowed. Suit is restored back to file.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Deepesh Kumar et al regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Deepesh Kumar et al regarding restoration of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank Of India vs M/s Network Academy regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vasudevan Pillai vs Muhammed Haneeffa C et al regarding restoration of a dismissed petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Johny Thomas vs Shiju alias Thampi regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Elsy James vs P.C Jose regarding restoration of original suit.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won