Case Summary
The case involves M/s Skyline Systems & Services seeking to recover Rs. 65,515/- from Jaison A A with interest, following an error in the amount stated in the original documents. The plaintiff has filed petitions to recall a witness and accept an additional affidavit to rectify a typographical mistake.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitions were deemed to have no merit and were seen as attempts to protract the proceedings.
The petitions were deemed to have no merit and were seen as attempts to protract the proceedings.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, Petitions are dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Joseph Philip (64 years)
Manayath, Recca Enclave, Padamugal, Kakkanad-682030
Leya Susan Varghese (42 years)
Flat No. 5A, Silver Oak Skyline City Park, Jawahar Nagar, Kadavanthara P O – 682020
Defendants
Jaison A A (Age not specified years)
Maxwin Aluminium Fabrication and Interior Work, Anjattuparambu House, Pattanam P O, Paravur, Pincode- 683522
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Petitions to recall PW1 and accept the additional proof affidavit.
Evidence:
Accordingly, I find no merit in the above petitions.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Additional Documents
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents were marked subject to proof and can be adduced subsequently without recalling PW1 as the evidence of plaintiff is not closed.
Reference:
Ext.A1, A3, A4 and A5