Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 464 /2021

Case between M/s Skyline Systems & Services vs Jaison A A regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-06-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/s Skyline Systems & Services seeking to recover Rs. 65,515/- from Jaison A A with interest, following an error in the amount stated in the original documents. The plaintiff has filed petitions to recall a witness and accept an additional affidavit to rectify a typographical mistake.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petitions filed by the plaintiff to recall a witness and to accept an additional affidavit were dismissed by the court. It was determined that reopening evidence was not appropriate at this stage.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitions were deemed to have no merit and were seen as attempts to protract the proceedings.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petitions are dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Joseph Philip (64 years) Manayath, Recca Enclave, Padamugal, Kakkanad-682030 Leya Susan Varghese (42 years) Flat No. 5A, Silver Oak Skyline City Park, Jawahar Nagar, Kadavanthara P O – 682020

Defendants

Jaison A A (Age not specified years) Maxwin Aluminium Fabrication and Interior Work, Anjattuparambu House, Pattanam P O, Paravur, Pincode- 683522

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitions to recall PW1 and accept the additional proof affidavit.
Evidence:
Accordingly, I find no merit in the above petitions.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Additional Documents
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents were marked subject to proof and can be adduced subsequently without recalling PW1 as the evidence of plaintiff is not closed.
Reference:
Ext.A1, A3, A4 and A5

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases