Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 464/2021

Case between M/s Skyline Systems and Services vs Jaison A A regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration
approximately-4 years 5 months
Case Closed
Wed, 09/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s Skyline Systems and Services, seeks recovery of money from the defendant, Jaison A A, for unpaid invoices related to construction materials. The defendant contends that there were no commercial transactions between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 65,515 along with interest. The court found sufficient evidence to support the plaintiff's claims against the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs. 65,515 along with interest @ 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 65,515 along with interest. The court found sufficient evidence to support the plaintiff's claims against the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the case with adequate evidence substantiating the outstanding amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case, and the plaint claim is not barred by limitation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.65,515/- (Rupees Sixty five thousand five hundred and fifteen only) along with interest @ 12 % from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Skyline Systems and Services
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jaison A A
Plaintiffs Documents
Notarized copy of the Re–Constitution of the Partnership deed, Original resolution, Invoice No: GBR/505 dated 06.12.2017 for an amount Rs. 53,264/-, Invoice No: GBR/731 dated 22.02.2018 for an amount Rs. 66,127/-, Account Statement maintained by the plaintiff with the defendant from 01.04.2017 to 23.03.2021, True copy of the lawyer notice dated 24.03.2021, Postal receipt dated 24.03.2021
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S Sudheeshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ajay N S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Babykuttan K C
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Varghesekutty K P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Neeraj T N
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of the outstanding amount of Rs. 65,515 along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.65,515/- (Rupees Sixty five thousand five hundred and fifteen only) along with interest @ 12 % from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Reconstitution of Partnership deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence to support the plaintiff's authority to sue.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original resolution to authorize PW1 to adduce evidence on behalf of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax invoice to show the amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax invoice to further substantiate the claim against the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing transactions and the outstanding amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to demand payment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt to prove the sending of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s Skyline Systems and Services vs Jaison A A regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Skyline Systems and Services vs Jaison A A regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 04/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 09/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won