Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 464/2021

Case between M/s Skyline Systems and Services vs Jaison A A regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration
approximately-4 years 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s Skyline Systems and Services, seeks recovery of money from the defendant, Jaison A A, for unpaid invoices related to construction materials. The defendant contends that there were no commercial transactions between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 65,515 along with interest. The court found sufficient evidence to support the plaintiff's claims against the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs. 65,515 along with interest @ 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the case with adequate evidence substantiating the outstanding amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.65,515/- (Rupees Sixty five thousand five hundred and fifteen only) along with interest @ 12 % from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Joseph Philip (64 years) Manayath, Reccaa Enclave, Padamugal, Kakkanad, Kochi 682 030

Defendants

Jaison A A (Age not specified years) Anjattu Parambu House, Pattanam P O, North Paravoor, Pin – 683 522

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of the outstanding amount of Rs. 65,515 along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.65,515/- (Rupees Sixty five thousand five hundred and fifteen only) along with interest @ 12 % from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Reconstitution of Partnership deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked as evidence to support the plaintiff's authority to sue.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original resolution to authorize PW1 to adduce evidence on behalf of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax invoice to show the amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax invoice to further substantiate the claim against the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing transactions and the outstanding amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to demand payment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt to prove the sending of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 04/01/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases