Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
MA (Arbitration) No. 25/2025

Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Shalu M et al regarding Arbitration petition

Court
COMMERCIAL COURT OF KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Leena Rasheed
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Shriram Finance Limited filed a petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation act regarding their case against Shalu M and Sugunan. The respondents were set ex-parte as no representation was made.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court closed the proceedings as the purpose of the petition was accomplished and the respondents were set ex-parte.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Arbitration
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the proceedings as the purpose of the petition was accomplished and the respondents were set ex-parte.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The application satisfied the purpose without opposition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The application satisfied the purpose without opposition.
Supporting Evidence
No representation for respondents. No counter filed. Hence, set exparte.

Judgment Evidence:

Possession taken, purpose of petition accomplished. Hence proceedings closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Shriram Finance Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shalu M
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sugunan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K Sivadasan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.T Rewaras
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Rehana K.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The proceedings were closed as the purpose of the petition was accomplished.
Evidence:
Possession taken, purpose of petition accomplished. Hence proceedings closed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referenced the commission report as filed to indicate that the purpose of the petition was accomplished.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Arbitration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Shalu M et al regarding Arbitration petition
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Shriram Finance Limited vs Shalu M et al regarding Arbitration petition

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd vs Gireesh Parakkal Meethal regarding petition under section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Arbitration Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited vs Jose Traders et al regarding Arbitration and conciliation
Commercial Court of Kozhikode
Arbitration Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd vs Bijoy Babu N et al regarding Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
COMMERCIAL COURT OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Plaintiff Won
Case between Manappuram Finance Ltd vs Rahim Muliyar Povval et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Defendant Won
Case between Manapuram Finance Ltd vs Ahammed Shamnas N A et al regarding petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Dismissed