Case Summary
M/s Shekhawati Traders filed a complaint against Mr. Ajith Ramachandran for an alleged offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint was dismissed due to no representation by the complainant's counsel.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed by the court due to the absence of representation by the complainant. The matter could not proceed as the representation was not made.
Key Reasoning:
The complaint was dismissed due to non-representation by the complainant's counsel.
The complaint was dismissed due to non-representation by the complainant's counsel.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The complaint was dismissed due to non-representation by the complainant's counsel.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Complaint is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Shekhawati Traders
- Relation
- Proprietor
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Ajith Ramachandran
- Party Age
- 50
Plaintiffs Documents
Complaint dated 19.04.2021
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Alex Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Shahidha P A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Complaint is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Evidence:
Hence Complaint is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act