Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.533/2025

Case between M/s Ruby Star Constructions Pvt Ltd vs Ashakhan Aji et al regarding Injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-09-12
Duration
Case Code No.
533
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s Ruby Star Constructions Pvt Ltd, represented by Director Shahabudeen, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, Ashakhan Aji and Aji Sindha Maitheen. The matter was settled between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of a compromise reached between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of a compromise reached between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Compromise recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

Compromise recorded. Suit decreed in terms of compromise and the memorandum of agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Ruby Star Constructions Pvt Ltd
Relation
Represented by Director, Shahabudeen
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashakhan Aji
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o Aji Sindha Mytheen
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aji Sindha Maitheen
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o Sindha Mytheen
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shaji Divakaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smitha Stanley
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vinu Karunakaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise and the memorandum of agreement shall form part of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the compromise agreement between the parties and recorded it as part of the decree.
Reference:
IA 5/25

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Haridasan Potti vs Vedikkunnu Balaganapathi Kshethram regarding Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Sudharma et al vs Saraswathy et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Remya Raj vs Anupama regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Pious George et al vs Salavudeen et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Joseph.S et al vs Manohar Yesudas et al regarding Injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won