Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 44/2024

Case between Ms. Rosamma John et al vs Divya C.S regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-05-20
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Ms. Rosamma John and Mr. T.M. John, are seeking eviction of their tenant, Divya C.S, from their property for personal use due to health reasons and missed rent payments. The tenant disputes the claims and argues that she has maintained her tenancy and the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction of the tenant from the disputed property after considering the lack of evidence from the respondent and the petitioners' genuine need for the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioners' claim to be uncontroverted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed u/sec. 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows:- The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ms. Rosamma John (72 years years) Thayyil House, Mylapra Town P.O, Kozhanchery, Pathanamthitta-689 678 Mr. T.M. John (81 years years) Thayyil House, Mylapra Town P.O, Kozhanchery, Pathanamthitta-689 678

Defendants

Divya C.S (Age not specified years) 39/208, Friend's Nagar, Near Model Engineering College, Kanayannur Taluk, Vazhakkala Village, Thrikkakkara P.O, Ernakulam-682021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to vacate the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to costs of the petition.
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents related to the tenancy agreement between the petitioners and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1, Ext.A2, Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
An original acknowledgment card tendered in evidence to confirm communication with the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A legal notice sent to the respondent regarding the payment of arrears and eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 06/09/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases