Case Summary
M/s. Purnima Papers is suing Shaju Mathew for money owed from past transactions for the sale of paper materials. The defendant has not made any payments since January 2020, and the plaintiff claims an amount of ₹6,83,617.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the defendant, stating that the suit was barred by limitation as it was filed after the period allowed for such claims.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to being filed after the limitation period.
The suit was dismissed due to being filed after the limitation period.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to being filed after the limitation period.
The suit was dismissed due to being filed after the limitation period.
Supporting Evidence
It is evident that the suit is filed after the period of limitation. Hence, there cannot be an order or judgment in favour of the plaintiff, and the suit is clearly barred by limitation.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed. The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Purnima Papers
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shaju Mathew
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Computer print out of Ledger Account Statement, Office copy of the Lawyer Notice, Returned postal acknowledgment
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shiju Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sachu Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manu T. M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anaina Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of money owed by the defendant.
Evidence:
the suit is clearly barred by limitation.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Computer print out of Ledger Account Statement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's claim regarding the amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is related to the plaintiff's communication with the defendant regarding the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Returned postal acknowledgment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the receipt of notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Purnima Papers vs Shaju Mathew regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Purnima Papers vs Shaju Mathew regarding realisation of money