Case Summary
The case involves M/s. Olive Builders as the plaintiff and the Olive Courtyard Owners Association (OCOA) and its Secretary as defendants. The dispute centers on the allocation of car parking spaces in a residential project, and the alleged misrepresentation by the builder regarding visitor parking.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner to inspect the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner would facilitate fair adjudication of the suit's issues.
The court found that the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner would facilitate fair adjudication of the suit's issues.
Judgment Evidence:
In the light of the above discussion, the petition is allowed on the following terms:- 1) Advocate Muhammed Bin Muhammed Nisar is appointed as the Commissioner in this case...
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
M/s. Olive Builders (Age not specified years)
103-104 J.K Chambers, Sector 70, Vashi, Navi Mumbai 400703, Having Branch Office at Olive House, 50/932 A, Devankullangara Junction, Olive House, Edappally North, Kochi-682024
Defendants
Olive Courtyard Owners Association (OCOA) (Age not specified years)
Opposite Infopark Kakkanad, Thengode P.O., Kochi-682023
Thajis Thameen (Age not specified years)
Opposite Inforpark, Kakkanad, Thengode P.O., Kochi-682030
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property and assess guest parking provisions.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed on the following terms:- Advocate Muhammed Bin Muhammed Nisar is appointed as the Commissioner in this case.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property and report on guest parking provisions.
Reference: