Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No. 332 /2024

Case between M/s. Olive Builders vs Olive Courtyard Owners Association (OCOA) et al regarding parking allocation in residential project.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany.
Order Date
2024-08-17
Duration
Case Code No.
332
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/s. Olive Builders as the plaintiff and the Olive Courtyard Owners Association (OCOA) and its Secretary as defendants. The dispute centers on the allocation of car parking spaces in a residential project, and the alleged misrepresentation by the builder regarding visitor parking.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the defendants' petition for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to assess matters related to guest parking.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner to inspect the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the defendants' petition for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to assess matters related to guest parking.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner would facilitate fair adjudication of the suit's issues.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The question as to whether providing guest parking is mandatory or not and whether there is any violation of building rules are to be decided only after trial.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of the above discussion, the petition is allowed on the following terms:- 1) Advocate Muhammed Bin Muhammed Nisar is appointed as the Commissioner in this case...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Olive Builders
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Olive Courtyard Owners Association (OCOA)
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thajis Thameen
Relation
Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Blaze.K.Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Treesa Rose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alphin Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aadithyan.S.Mannali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property and assess guest parking provisions.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed on the following terms:- Advocate Muhammed Bin Muhammed Nisar is appointed as the Commissioner in this case.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property and report on guest parking provisions.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Violation of lease conditions
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Society

Similar Cases

Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binu E B vs Treesa Mary T M regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won