Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.1130/2020

Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-24
Duration
approximately-6 years 9 months
Case Code No.
1130
Case Closed
Wed, 01/24/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Smt. Baby Ravi filed a suit against Sajini Nandakumar for the realization of Rs. 4,67,800 along with interest due to a contractual agreement. The defendant failed to appear in court and was set exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 4,67,800 along with interest. The defendant is made personally liable for the payment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant shall pay Rs. 4,67,800 along with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 4,67,800 along with interest. The defendant is made personally liable for the payment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case based on the unchallenged evidence provided.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a case based on the unchallenged evidence provided.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,67,800 from defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.4,67,800 along with interest @12% per annum from 23.11.2020 till the date of decree and @6% per annum from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smt. Baby Ravi
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajini Nandakumar
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lawyer notice dated 14.07.2020, returned postal cover with A/D card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Russel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.R. Arun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anto Thomas Palatty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreelakshmi Sabu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall pay Rs.4,67,800 along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.4,67,800 (Rupees four lakhs sixty seven thousand and eight hundred only) along with interest.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall be personally liable to satisfy the decree.
Evidence:
2) Defendant shall be personally and her assets shall be liable to satisfy the decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff shall also be entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
3) Plaintiff shall also be entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendant on behalf of plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned postal cover with A/D Card.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 04/03/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/24/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between S. Muhammed Haneef vs Dr. Kala.T.V. regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won