Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S.No.379/2020

Case between S. Muhammed Haneef vs Dr. Kala.T.V. regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-20
Duration
approximately-4 years 11 months 20 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

S. Muhammed Haneef, an advocate, filed a suit against Dr. Kala.T.V., an assistant professor, for non-payment of professional fees amounting to Rs. 1,25,000. The defendant was absent during the proceedings and was set exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,25,000 along with interest from the date of the suit. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.1,25,000 along with interest @ 12% and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established a case and the evidence remained unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.1,25,000 along with interest @ 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

S. Muhammed Haneef (57 years) T4, 14 C, Tritvam, GIDA Road, Marine Drive, Pin – 682 018

Defendants

Dr. Kala.T.V. (Age not specified years) Thalavanathekkethil House, Mannankarachira, Kavumbhagom.P.O., Thiruvalla, Pin – 689 102

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff claimed recovery of Rs.1,25,000/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,25,000/- with interest from defendant.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of the judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Judgment in WP(C) No.22240/17 of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala which is relevant to the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Judgment in WP(C) No.32827/17 of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala which is relevant to the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Judgment in Con.Case(C) No.1738/17 of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala which is relevant to the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Computer printout of the proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proceedings in WP(C) No.22240/17 before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Computer printout of the proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proceedings in Con.Case(C) No.1738/17 before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Computer printout of the proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proceedings in WP(C) No.32827/17 before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of lawyer notice issued to defendant demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of lawyer notice issued to defendant demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases