Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.379/2020

Case between S. Muhammed Haneef vs Dr. Kala.T.V. regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-20
Duration
approximately-4 years 11 months 20 days
Case Code No.
379
Case Closed
Sat, 01/20/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

S. Muhammed Haneef, an advocate, filed a suit against Dr. Kala.T.V., an assistant professor, for non-payment of professional fees amounting to Rs. 1,25,000. The defendant was absent during the proceedings and was set exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,25,000 along with interest from the date of the suit. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.1,25,000 along with interest @ 12% and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,25,000 along with interest from the date of the suit. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established a case and the evidence remained unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff established a case and the evidence remained unchallenged.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,25,000 with interest from defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.1,25,000 along with interest @ 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S. Muhammed Haneef
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Kala.T.V.
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of judgment in WP(C) No.22240/17, Certified copy of judgment in WP(C) No.32827/17, Certified copy of judgment in Con.Case(C) No.1738/17, Computer printout of proceedings in WP(C) No.22240/17, Computer printout of proceedings in Con.Case(C) No.1738/17, Computer printout of proceedings in WP(C) No.32827/17, Office copy of lawyer notice issued to defendant dated 28.03.2019, Office copy of lawyer notice issued to defendant dated 24.06.2019.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajith Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anoopa.M.J.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanu.S.Malakeel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prerith Philip Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Balram.S.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.C. Xavier
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff claimed recovery of Rs.1,25,000/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,25,000/- with interest from defendant.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of the judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Judgment in WP(C) No.22240/17 of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala which is relevant to the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Judgment in WP(C) No.32827/17 of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala which is relevant to the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Judgment in Con.Case(C) No.1738/17 of Hon'ble High Court of Kerala which is relevant to the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Computer printout of the proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proceedings in WP(C) No.22240/17 before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Computer printout of the proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proceedings in Con.Case(C) No.1738/17 before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Computer printout of the proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proceedings in WP(C) No.32827/17 before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of lawyer notice issued to defendant demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of lawyer notice issued to defendant demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 01/20/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won