Society

The plaintiffs are the Cherama Sambava Development Society, claiming to be the current office bearers and seeking a temporary injunction against the defendants for unauthorized use of the society's name and registration. The defendants contest this claim, asserting they are the rightful office bearers.

The plaintiffs, representing a drinking water project society, filed a suit against the defendants, a public irrigation project society, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain them from drawing water from a specific pond. The dispute centers around the rights to draw water from a pond used by both parties.

The plaintiff, Self Employer’ s Service Society, filed a suit against the defendants for recovery of money related to a loan sanctioned to the first defendant. The defendants defaulted on the repayment, leading to the plaintiff seeking legal relief.

Rajappan filed a suit against MuraleedharanNair and others for declaration of his rights over certain properties and to restrain them from trespassing. The defendants contested the allegations and denied the claims made by the plaintiff.

Rajappan filed a suit seeking declaration of ownership and injunction against MuraleedharanNair and others. The suit involves disputes over property and allegations of fraudulent deeds.

Usman. E filed a suit against N. K. Abdurahiman and others for declaring a document as null and void and for its cancellation. The plaintiff claims that the defendants transferred property without proper consent, causing potential harm to the Priyadarshini Study Centre.

The plaintiffs, Velayudhan. K. P and K. N. Vijayan, filed a suit against the defendants, including Shri. Subrata. K Mishra and the National Council of Science Museums. The case was dismissed as not pressed, indicating the plaintiffs chose not to pursue it further.

The plaintiffs, Abdul Kalam.A and Mohanan Nair, are involved in a suit against The Kerala Agri-Horticultural Society and others. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs to adduce evidence.

The plaintiffs, including Madanlal.T.R and others, filed a suit against SFS Carlton Owners’ Association and its members due to alleged administrative irregularities and improper election processes within the association. They sought relief for violations of by-laws and improper handling of financial matters.

The case involves M/s. Olive Builders as the plaintiff and the Olive Courtyard Owners Association (OCOA) and its Secretary as defendants. The dispute centers on the allocation of car parking spaces in a residential project, and the alleged misrepresentation by the builder regarding visitor parking.