Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1101/2023

Case between M/s. Kingdom Protection Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Mr. Shanavas regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-16
Duration
approximately-5 years 2 months
Case Closed
Fri, 08/16/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, a Private Limited Company, provided security services to the defendant's firm under a written agreement. The defendant failed to make timely payments for these services, leading the plaintiff to file a suit for the outstanding amounts.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favour of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding amount with interest. The plaintiff was also granted the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,71,444/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favour of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding amount with interest. The plaintiff was also granted the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff was found to be uncontested and credible.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of the plaintiff was found to be uncontested and credible.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 1,71,444/- (Rupees one lakhs seventy one thousand four hundred and forty four only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Kingdom Protection Services Pvt. Ltd.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Asokan K.K
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Shanavas
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement dated 24.5.2019, Office copy of the Lawyer Notice dated 07.07.2021, Certificate u/s. 63 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, Certificate u/s. 65 B of Indian Evidence Act.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shaji Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.1,71,444/- to the plaintiff with interest.
Evidence:
I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 1,71,444/- (Rupees one lakhs seventy one thousand four hundred and forty four only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Computer print out of account summary
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided the financial record detailing amounts due and payments made.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certificate u/s. 63 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate was likely presented to substantiate the evidence as per legal provisions.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Certificate u/s. 65 B of Indian Evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate was relevant for proving the electronic records admissible in court.
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)
Document Type: Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was a formal demand for payment to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document served as proof of the delivery of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice from the defendant acknowledging the payment plan proposed.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter authorized the representative to act on behalf of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Kingdom Protection Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Mr. Shanavas regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Kingdom Protection Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Mr. Shanavas regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 05/24/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/16/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won