Case Summary
M/s. Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd filed a petition under Section 9(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 against Babu Rajan A.C and Seena K. The application was dismissed for default due to non-representation by the petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Arbitration
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default as there was no representation from the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd
- Relation
- Rep. By Power of Attorney holder Vineesh K
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu Rajan A.C
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Seena K
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Noushad Kallada
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Rajith kumar P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P. Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed for default due to lack of representation and non-payment of batta.
Evidence:
No representation for petitioner. It is submitted by commissioner that batta is not paid. Hence petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Arbitration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd vs Babu Rajan A.C et al regarding arbitration application.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd vs Babu Rajan A.C et al regarding arbitration application.