Case Summary
M/s. HDFC Bank Ltd. filed a complaint against Kamarudeen alleging an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the absence of the complainant and the lack of a withdrawal petition.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence I am of view complainant did not interested to proceed the case. Complainant is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. HDFC Bank Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kamarudeen
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- Adv.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The complainant is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Evidence:
Hence I am of view complainant did not interested to proceed the case. Complainant is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST
Case Code Year
2020
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act