Case Summary
HDFC Bank Ltd is the complainant represented by Shemeer J. The accused Jobin Joyce was charged under U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court ordered the acquittal of the accused due to the absence of the complainant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused Jobin Joyce under section 256 Cr.PC as the complainant was repeatedly absent.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The complainant's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
The complainant's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant is repeatedly absent. Hence complaint is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Judgment Evidence:
The court ordered acquittal u/s.256 Cr.PC due to the absence of the complainant.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- HDFC Bank Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jobin Joyce
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T R Sathyan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Complaint dismissed due to the complainant's repeated absence.
Evidence:
Complainant Absent. No representation. No application. Accused represented. Complainant is repeatedly absent. Hence complaint is dismissed under section 256 Cr.PC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2020
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour