Case Summary
HDFC Bank Ltd filed a complaint against Sainaba N Y alleging an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court was unable to proceed with the matter due to the absence of the complainant and has dismissed the complaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed due to the absence of the complainant and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the complaint due to the absence of the complainant.
The court dismissed the complaint due to the absence of the complainant.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court is unable to proceed with matter. Complaint is dismissed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the court is unable to proceed with matter. Complaint is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- HDFC Bank Ltd
- Relation
- represented through its duly authorised Manager(legal) Arjun C A
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sainaba N Y
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Complaint filed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Sathisan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.Mujeeb
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Complaint is dismissed
Evidence:
Hence the court is unable to proceed with matter. Complaint is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act