Case Summary
M/s Future Marketing Company is seeking to recover an outstanding amount from Krimson Agencies for electrical items supplied. Despite reminders and a legal notice, Krimson Agencies failed to pay the dues.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay ₹94,501 with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹94,501 plus interest and costs. The court allowed a reasonable interest rate based on mutual agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents submitted by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the claim.
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents submitted by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents submitted by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the claim.
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents submitted by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹94,501/- (Rupees Ninety Four Thousand Five Hundred and one only), with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Future Marketing Company
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Krimson Agencies
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of the Power of Attorney, True copy of the tax Invoice bearing no. FMC/700/22-23, True copy of the ledger account from 01.04.22 to 06.09.23 of the defendant kept by the plaintiff, True copy of the lawyer notice issued by the plaintiff, Returned notice with A/d card, Certificate filed under section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jinish Paul P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sneha V
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the total amount due with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹94,501/- (Rupees Ninety Four Thousand Five Hundred and one only), with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the litigation.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of the Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as proof of authority for the plaintiff in the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Tax Invoice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This invoice evidences the transaction and amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Ledger Account
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides detailed records of transactions between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to demand payment and reflects the failure of the defendant to respond.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Returned notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows evidence that the lawyer notice was returned, indicating difficulty in communication with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Certificate filed under section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate serves as formal evidence as per the applicable legal provisions.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s Future Marketing Company vs Krimson Agencies regarding money recovery
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Future Marketing Company vs Krimson Agencies regarding money recovery