Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1085/2024

Case between M/s Future Marketing Company vs Krimson Agencies regarding money recovery

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M., I Additional Munsiff
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Future Marketing Company is seeking to recover an outstanding amount from Krimson Agencies for electrical items supplied. Despite reminders and a legal notice, Krimson Agencies failed to pay the dues.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹94,501 plus interest and costs. The court allowed a reasonable interest rate based on mutual agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay ₹94,501 with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents submitted by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹94,501/- (Rupees Ninety Four Thousand Five Hundred and one only), with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Future Marketing Company (Age not specified years) Door no. 3/578-D2, 4th floor, Zera tower, Cheranelloor, Ernakulam - - 682 034

Defendants

Krimson Agencies (Age not specified years) Muvattupuzha, 21/93 Kottakkalil building, Avoli, Muvattupuzha, Ernakulam, Kerala - 686 661

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the total amount due with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹94,501/- (Rupees Ninety Four Thousand Five Hundred and one only), with 12% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the litigation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of the Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as proof of authority for the plaintiff in the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This invoice evidences the transaction and amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Ledger Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides detailed records of transactions between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to demand payment and reflects the failure of the defendant to respond.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Returned notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows evidence that the lawyer notice was returned, indicating difficulty in communication with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certificate filed under section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate serves as formal evidence as per the applicable legal provisions.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases