Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 459/2018

Case between M/s Desai Brothers (papers) Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Don Bosco Industries regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-06-28
Duration
approximately-6 years 11 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Desai Brothers (papers) Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against M/s Don Bosco Industries for the recovery of money owed. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to pay outstanding dues for goods supplied on credit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed, and the plaintiff was not entitled to a decree for the realization of the amount claimed. The court found in favor of the defendant on the basis of limitation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the suit was barred by law of limitation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. Plaintiff is not entitled for a decree of realization of Rs. 1,41,077/- from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s Desai Brothers (papers) Pvt. Ltd (Age not specified years) Bazar road, Mattancherry, Kochi – 2, having corporate office at D.D. Vastramahal, Market road, kochi – 31

Defendants

M/s Don Bosco Industries (40 years) Mundackal west, Kollam, Pin – 691 001

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover an outstanding amount from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed. Plaintiff is not entitled for a decree of realization of Rs. 1,41,077/- from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Combined original ledger statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the amount owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: True copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served as evidence of the demand for payment made to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original reply issued by Adv.Benoy Bal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented as evidence regarding the communication between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Included in the defendant's contentions against the claims of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Office copy of the reply issued by Adv.Benoy Bal
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Provided as a response to the allegations made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of communication sent by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Confirmed the receipt of correspondence by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases