Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1108/2023

Case between M/s Cartopacks et al vs Abdul Rashid regarding recovery of money.

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-22
Duration
approximately-1 year 9 months
Case Closed
Thu, 02/22/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Cartopacks, a partnership firm, is suing Abdul Rashid for recovery of an amount due from the sale of corrugated cartons. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has not paid the outstanding balance and interest despite receiving a lawyer's notice.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.2,96,388 with interest and costs of the suit. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the decree amount from the defendant's assets in default.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.2,96,388 with 8% future interest per annum and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.2,96,388 with interest and costs of the suit. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the decree amount from the defendant's assets in default.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.2,96,388...(etc.)

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Cartopacks
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V.Vinod Kumar
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Rashid
Party Age
45
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Invoice no. GSTR 225, True copy of Invoice no. GSTR 303, True copy of the Account statement, Lawyer notice, Acknowledgement card, Certified copy of the power of attorney.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.P.Jose Pious
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Sunil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree directing the defendant to pay the outstanding amount along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.2,96,388/- with 8% future interest per annum from the date of suit ( ie, from 16.11.2023) till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendant for the supply of goods.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: True copy of Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the claims made regarding the amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: True copy of the account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement details the transactions between the plaintiff and the defendant, indicating the outstanding balance.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendant demanding payment and illustrates the plaintiff's efforts to collect the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card indicates receipt of the lawyer notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of the Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the authority of the person representing the plaintiff in this case.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s Cartopacks et al vs Abdul Rashid regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Cartopacks et al vs Abdul Rashid regarding recovery of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 05/19/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 02/22/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won