Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No.185 OF 2019

Case between M/s Bharathy Auto Finance vs Muhammed Musthafa regarding money loan repayment

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Bharathy Auto Finance is the plaintiff and Muhammed Musthafa is the defendant. The case involves a loan of Rs. 50,000 borrowed by the defendant from the plaintiff, for which the defendant failed to make repayment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 62,750 with interest. The plaintiff was also entitled to the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.62,750 with interest @ 18% per annum till realization, to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence which remained unchallenged due to the defendant's absence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows 1. The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.62,750/- (Rupees Sixty Two Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty only), with interest @ 18% per annum thereon from the date of suit till realization, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

R.Rajamani (48 years) Door No.26/175L 204, 1st Floor, Nusrath Complex, Naduvilangadi, Tirur amsom desom, P.O.Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Muhammed Musthafa (49 years) Pachattiri amsom & Post, Pariyapuram desom, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 105

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs. 62,750/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defendant executed a Promissory Note for Rs. 50,000/- in favor of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff issued a notice demanding payment of the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Returned notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned notice from the defendant marked as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Sat, 01/20/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases